Tom Swift and the Electronic
Hydrolung
By Victor Appleton II
The following summary was written by
Graeme Woods. Thanks yet again for volunteering! This is the last Tom
Swift Jr. summary of the lot: with this summary, the Complete Tom Swift is now
complete!
Summary: This book commences with Tom Swift Jr. working with the Navy to recover a Jupiter probe missile designed and built by Swift Enterprises on behalf of the government. However the Brungarians intercept the probe and Tom must race against time to recover it from the bottom of the ocean before the Brungarians can steal the probe and its scientific data. As the story unfolds, Tom invents several underwater devices to assist with the recovery and counter the threat of a new stealth submarine developed by the Brungarians.
Major Inventions
This book introduces a number of inventions that
fall into two categories; devices that assist skin divers to recover the
Jupiter probe (electronic hydrolung, hydrolung density control device,
hydrolung ion drive) and devices that counter the threat of the new Brungarian
stealth submarine (anti-detection jetmarine, quality analyser sonar).
Electronic
Hydrolung
Mr. Swift suggests the hydrolung:
"Whatís
needed is a new type of breathing device ñ one that will eliminate bulky air
tanks and permit a skin diver to stay down for long periods."
The hydrolung is a small device that extracts
dissolved oxygen from water to allow skin divers to breathe underwater.
How does the electronic
hydrolung work? The hydrolung
uses the osmotic air conditioning principle described in Tom Swift and His Deep-Sea Hydrodrome. This is how Tom describes the process in that
book:
Going over
to a blackboard, Tom sketched out his idea. "Weíll pump in sea water and
extract its dissolved oxygen by osmosis through a membrane ñ like this. Then
weíll dry the oxygen in a dehumidifier and pump it into the dome through a
heating and decompression unit. The stale air is then drawn out by a
compressor, and the waste carbon dioxide is given off to the same sea water in
exchange for the oxygen we removed. Of course there would be a constant
circulation of both sea water and air.
This is how Tom explains the hydrolung:
"How
does it work?" Phyl asked, fascinated.
Tom
explained, "Actually its function is to replace the carbon dioxide that I
exhale with fresh oxygen drawn from the water. Otherwise, although the carbon
dioxide Iíd breathe out would be a very small amount at a time, it soon would
make the air unfit. The nitrogen, which makes up much of the air we breathe, is
chemically inert and can be used again and again."
He pointed
to a round screen on one side of the unit. "This is the water
intake," Tom went on, "and this other screen is where the water comes
out after weíve removed its oxygen."
Near the
forward end of the unit, a semirigid plastic tube was connected, leading up to
the face mask. At the rear was a power port for inserting a small solar
battery.
"What
about this little tuning knob?" Sandy asked.
"Thatís
the rate control for adjusting the output frequency to the wearerís breathing
rate." Tom added, "Iíve decided to call the whole apparatus an
ëelectronic hydrolung.í"
Unfortunately on its first test, Tom
suffers from the bends upon ascending because the pressure change allows
nitrogen bubbles to form in his blood. He decides to eliminate this problem:
"Iíll
install a special device to remove the nitrogen as the wearer exhales,"
Tom explained. "Then a valve will feed in helium to replace it. Since
helium doesnít dissolve in the blood like nitrogen does, it will not bubble out
when the pressure is reduced. Should have thought of that before!"
"But
youíll need a tank for the helium, wonít you?" Bud objected.
Tom shook
his head. "Enough can be compressed into a small capsule to supply the
wearerís needs. Remember, it can be used over and over again."
Would the electronic hydrolung
work? The principle of the
electronic hydrolung is sound; fish obtain their oxygen from water using their
gills. Their gills perform the role of Tomís osmotic membrane.
Scientists tried a device that is similar
to the hydrolung in 1970. However no one has yet devised a practical hydrolung
although new materials are allowing us to get closer to this. One problem is
extracting enough oxygen from water for a person to breathe. Since Tomís
hydrolung has a solar battery powering it, this could be used to pump water
through the hydrolung which would make the idea practical since the osmotic
membrane would not need to be so efficient.
The solar battery is a sort of super
capacitor that is charged in Tomís space outpost by solar radiation. Although
scientists are now working on super capacitors that can store far more energy
than todayís batteries, we donít currently have anything with the power density
of a solar battery.
The osmotic membrane must perform several
roles; it needs to take oxygen from the water, dissolve exhaled carbon dioxide
into the water and remove exhaled nitrogen and retain exhaled helium.
I believe that an electronic hydrolung
will ultimately be possible. A simple osmotic membrane may not provide the
performance needed and I believe that it will comprise a combination of special
materials with high surface areas and affinities to particular gasses.
What impact would the
electronic hydrolung have on our lives? A hydrolung would open up skin diving because bulky and inconvenient
air bottles would no longer be needed. Also a diver would not need to come up
for air since the hydrolung could simply extract oxygen from the water as
required. This means that man could live beneath the sea for extended periods.
This would open up underwater farming.
Since the hydrolung replaces nitrogen
dissolved in the blood with helium (which does not dissolve in the blood), the
risk of the bends (as a result of pressure changes causing the nitrogen to come
out of solution into cells as bubbles) is eliminated.
Hydrolung
density control device
The density control unit allows a diver
to ascend and descend by varying his underwater density.
How does the density
control device work? This is how
the book explains the density control device:
"Itís a
density-control device," Tom explained. "A substitute for ballast
tanks, you might say. Itíll enable us to rise or sink to any depth at will,
simply by varying our underwater density."
Tom said the
device would be carried in a small case, hooked to the diverís belt, with a
single tuning-knob control. The "throttle" or speed control for the
ion drive would be housed in the same unit.
As you can see, the description doesnít
give any indication of how this device works.
Would the density control
device work? I believe that it is
improbable that a device that can be carried in a small diverís belt mounted
case could change the density of a diver, unless it uses some previously
unknown effect.
Fish have swim bladders that can be
filled with oxygen and nitrogen from the blood to adjust buoyancy to whatever
depth the fish is swimming at so that the fish can maintain its level without
effort. Submarines use ballast tanks to achieve the same result. In both cases,
the size of the bladder or tank is relatively large in proportion to the size
of the fish or submarine. Some exploration submarines such as the Bathyscape
carry weights to be released when they need to ascend.
A scuba diver wears a weight belt to
achieve neutral buoyancy which allows the diver to swim up or down easily.
What impact would the
density control device have on our lives? A working density control device would have its biggest impact in
submarine technology. There would no longer be a need for bulky ballast tanks.
Also scuba divers would no longer need heavy weight belts to overcome excess
buoyancy.
Hydrolung
ion drive
The ion drive is a small but powerful
underwater jet that is mounted on a diverís back to provide underwater
propulsion.
How does the underwater ion
drive work? The underwater ion drive
is described as:
"a
slender metal cylinder, two feet long, with an inner concentric tube projecting
at each end."
This is how Tom explains the idea to Bud:
"But
weíll need speed to cover the area. So first I want to add an ion drive to our equipment."
"Ion
drive? For underwater?" Bud, who was familiar with ion propulsion for
spaceships, wrinkled his brow in a puzzled frown.
"A
goofy idea just occurred to me, but I think it may work out," Tom replied.
He seized a pencil and began explaining what he had in mind.
The drive
unit would take water into itself, separate the ionized molecules, and expose
them to an electric field. Thus a stream of water would be forced out. This
procedure, in turn, would set up a siphoning action through a central tube ñ in
effect, creating a small but powerful water-jet motor.
So it is effectively a pump with no
moving parts that uses an electric field to repel the charged ions present in
water. The ion drive unit in the story is so powerful that the water jet pins
Tom against the wall of the test tank.
Would the underwater ion
drive work? In principle, this
could work. Even pure water contains ions that moved under the influence of an
electric current. This could theoretically be translated into motion. Electrophoresis
uses this effect to separate out different substances from solution for
analysis; the substance is soaked into filter paper and a positive current is
applied to one side of the paper and a negative current is applied to the other
side. The various substances migrate towards the opposite polarity.
Ion drives are being developed for
spacecraft. Ion drives provide very low thrust but can be operated for long
durations (in contrast a chemical rocket achieves speed through high
acceleration over a short time period).
However in practice I donít think the
underwater ion drive would work because the energy input relative to the motive
force produced would make a conventional propeller arrangement far more
practical.
What impact would the
underwater ion drive have on our lives? If the underwater ion drive worked, I would see its biggest
application in marine propulsion systems. Instead of complex and relatively
inefficient propeller systems, the ion drive would directly convert electrical
energy into motion without any moving parts.
Submarines could use a similar system to
avoid detection of propeller noise. As I recall, in "The Hunt for Red
October", the Russian submarine uses a "worm drive" which
apparently works in a similar way.
Anti-detection
jetmarine
The anti-detection equipment fitted to a
jetmarine prevents detection of the vessel either by hydrophone or sonar.
How does the anti-detection
jetmarine work? The idea on the
anti-detection equipment first comes to Tom while he is puzzling about how the
Brungarian submarine avoids being detected by sonar:
The idea
certainly sounded feasible. Suppose the submarine used a great many
"microphones" ñ or receiving transducers ñ to pick up the sonar
pulses beamed out by another craft trying to detect it? These impulses could
then be passed on and sent out by speakers on the opposite side of the sub, and
relayed along on their underwater path of travel.
Thus the
sonar waves would appear to be striking no obstacle ñ and no echo would return
to the sonarscopes on the search craft!
Initially Tom wires up a jetmarine with
hundreds of mikes and speakers all over the hull for testing. Later he develops
a plastic coating (made of Tomasite) that incorporates the transmitting and
receiving transducers spaced closely together, with the leads combined into a
single flat tape going to the central control unit.
Another way of detecting a submarine is
to listen to the sounds of the propellers or other machinery sounds. Tom
realised that even if a submarine is invisible to sonar, it is just as
vulnerable if an enemy can hear the noise it makes. This is how he decides to
address this issue:
"Well,
we can never do away with the noise of a subís propulsion machinery," Tom
began. "That goes without saying. So weíll have to camouflage it ñ lose it
in the underwater jungle noises, so to speak."
Bud
scratched his head. "How do we do that?"
"By
amplifying the natural undersea sounds all about it," Tom explained.
"Fish and all forms of underwater life make a background noise over the
hydrophones, you know."
As Bud
nodded, Tom went on, "So we simply step up the volume till the subís own
noise gets drowned out or ëwastedí in all the racket."
This could
be done, he concluded, with fairly simple amplifying equipment. Bud, Hank, and
Arv were jubilant at the idea.
Would the anti-detection
jetmarine work? Most modern
military submarines use anti-detection technologies, the details of which are
closely held military secrets.
In order to evade sonar, submarines now
have a special sonar absorbing coating. This is a passive defense, in contrast
to Tomís idea that uses active elements. The coatings prevent a reflection of
the sonar impulse, which effectively hides the submarine. This is similar in
concept to the B2 stealth bomber, which is designed in such a way to minimize
the radar reflections.
I think that Tomís idea of using
transducers has some merit. My only reservation is that the plastic coating
(unless it absorbs sonar impulses) may reflect back some of the sonar. Also the
transducers themselves may not absorb the impulses. Presumably Tomasite absorbs
or scatters enough of the impulses to avoid detection.
Some time ago on a science program I saw
some work being undertaken for the US Army to reduce the visibility of soldiers
that uses a similar active approach (but with light rather than sound). The
soldier would wear a suit that is made of closely spaced light emitters and
detectors. The emitters at the front of the suit would display the image that
the detectors picked up from behind the suit and vice-versa. This makes it very
difficult to actually see the soldier.
Tomís idea of amplifying natural undersea
sounds is also very interesting. The idea is to reduce the signal to noise
ratio by increasing the amount of background noise. I am not aware of this
technology being used on submarines. It might be possible to detect the
presence of a submarine using this technology by an increase in background
noise.
Normally, submarines use the opposite
approach of reducing propulsion noise by using quieter propeller designs and
other techniques to reduce the submarine noise below the background noise of
the ocean. By way of analogy, the stealth bomber uses special exhausts to reduce
the infrared signature of its engines so that they canít be detected above
ambient "noise". The overall effect is to reduce the signal to noise
ratio which is the same idea as in the book, but achieved in a different
manner.
In summary, I believe both approaches are
probably feasible, even if they are not being used in the way described in the
book.
What impact would the
anti-detection jetmarine have on our lives? Modern submarines do use sonar-absorbing coatings and are designed
for low noise, so technologies with a similar effect to those described in the
book are now in use.
Quality
analyser sonar
This invention counters the Brungarian
submarine stealth technology.
How does the quality
analyser sonar work? The quality
analyser sonar is Tomís invention to detect the stealth Brungarian submarine.
The Brungarians used their "invisible" submarine as a propaganda
coup. This is how the book describes the invention:
Tom
explained that the new system he had in mind would send out a complex pulse ñ
that is an underwater sound wave with many harmonics instead of a single tone,
sharp peaked sound impulse.
"This
will make it less likely that their anti-detection gear will absorb all of
it," Tom went on. "Whatís not absorbed will return as an echo. Iím
also going to modify our receivers. But Iíve still not worked that out."
Bud nodded,
his forehead puckered in a look of concentration. "So-?"
"So our
sonar picks up all that hash, and by means of a computer setup filters out the
subís real echo from the shadow reflections."
The book describes a "correlation
calculator" that is used to determine how close the returning pulse is to
the original pulse and displays blurred echoes or shadow echoes in red on the
screen. This would be an indication that a stealth submarine was detected
because it would absorb a range of frequencies and reflect some others. This
explains the name "quality analyser sonar" since it measures the
quality of the returned sonar pulses to determine the presence of an enemy
submarine.
Would the quality analyser
sonar work? The quality analyser
sonar would work if the Brungarian submarine would absorb only certain
frequencies. This would be likely if an "active" stealth approach is
used. If a passive sonar absorbing coating was used, it is likely that this
would be able to absorb a large frequency range.
The book preempts the computer systems
now in use to automatically analyse sonar data. Advanced technologies such as
neural networks are now being used. Perhaps Tom uses a simple form of neural
network in his "correlation calculator" since it is described as a
computer filter.
What impact would the
quality analyser sonar have on our lives? Technologies similar in principle to the quality analyser sonar, but
far more advanced, are in widespread use in the submarines throughout the
world. I attended an artificial intelligence conference in 1995 and there was a
large contingent of scientists who presented papers on similar systems that
they were developing for a submarine fleet.
Update on 3/5/2002: I received an e-mail a few days ago from Paul
Fronberg that told me that the Japanese had successfully tested a ship with an
underwater ion drive! It seems that there was actually a patent placed on this
idea around 1961 (patent number 2,997,013). You can find out more about it
here:
http://www.sof.or.jp/english/profile/
http://www.mesj.or.jp/bunken/english/pdf/mv18n011990p35.pdf
Looks like Tom Swift knew what he was doing
after all!
Tom Swift and the Visitor from Planet X | Tom Swift and his Triphibian Atomicar | Index